MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W80915352

The Werner Lake Co-Cu-Au deposit, Ontario: Evidence for pre-metamorphic hydrothermal origin

2001· article· en· W80915352 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Craig Therens

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiotiteGeochemistryGeologySchistChalcopyriteHydrothermal circulationMetamorphic rockPyritePyroxeneProtolithPyrrhotiteArcheanMineralOlivineQuartzCopperChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Werner Lake Co-Cu-Au deposit in the Late Archean English River metasedimentary subprovince of the Superior Province, Ontario, is hosted by pyroxene-bearing amphibolites, and is characterized by association with metamorphosed alteration assemblages including garnetiferous biotite schists, garnetiferous quartzites, and calc-silicate rocks. Mineralization includes disseminated chalcopyrite and massive chalcopyrite-pyrite rich lenses in the garnetiferous biotite schists and as disseminated to massive cobaltite-rich orebodies. Geochemical data support field relationships that the garnetiferous biotite schists originated from the protoliths of the amphibolites. Mass balance calculations revealed significant gains in Fe, Mn, and K, but losses in Ca, Na, and Mg, similar to those found for the formation of chloritic zones from seafloor hydrothermal alteration of basalts. The garnetiferous biotite schists are characterized by depletion in whole rock δ¹⁸O values (+4 to +6.5‰ V-SMOW) relative to the associated amphibolites (+6.8 to 8.3‰) and ultramafic rocks (+5.6 to 6.9‰). This depletion is interpreted as resulting from high-temperature interactions with seawater and thus supports a seafloor hydrothermal origin for the Werner Lake Co-Cu-Au deposit. The δ³⁴S values of sulphides and sulpharsenides in the ores of the Werner Lake deposit are uniformly close to 0‰, similar to those sulphides in the alteration assemblages (-0.5 to +2.3‰) and amphibolites (+0.3 to +1.8‰), suggesting a juvenile source for the S. The Werner Lake Co-Cu-Au deposit differs in ore-element chemistry, host lithology, and alteration assemblages from the Cu-Zn and Zn-Pb-Cu VMS deposits and therefore is interpreted to represent a separate type of seafloor hydrothermal deposit. The granulite facies metamorphism (640-750°C and 4.5 to 5.5 kbar) at the Werner Lake deposit was accompanied by penetrative deformation followed by retrogression and late hydrothermal alteration. However, this high-grade metamorphism did not obliterate the possibly syngenetic mineralization and alteration zonation. This preservation of primary features was attributed to an absence of pervasive fluids during and after the granulite facies metamorphism, as indicated by the oxygen isotope heterogeneity of the ores and associated lithologies and by the preservation of distinct oxygen isotope signatures in the garnetiferous biotite schists. Localized solid-state remobilization of cobaltite-rich ores during the granulite facies metamorphism and deformation is indicated by thickening of the orebodies close to the F₂ fold hinges and alignment of cobaltite porphyroblasts parallel to the S₂ foliation. The presence of chalcopyrite-rich veins associated with biotite-rich selvages suggests a local, fluid facilitated remobilization of chalcopyrite during retrogression. Both granulite facies metamorphism and retrogression may have resulted in the preferential removal of Fe-Cu-rich sulphides from the ores owing to their higher ductilities than cobaltite and silicates, thereby increasing the proportion of cobalt-rich ores. However, late hydrothermal alteration does not appear to have significantly disturbed the Co mineralization in the Werner Lake Deposit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207