MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Murine GLUTag Cells

2015· book-chapter· en· W812641138 on OpenAlexafffund
Manuel Gil‐Lozano, Patricia L. Brubaker

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of TorontoCanada Research ChairsCanadian Diabetes Association
KeywordsProglucagonEnteroendocrine cellSecretionGlucagon-like peptide-1IncretinGlucagonCell cultureCell biologyGenetically modified mouseBiologyTransgeneHormoneType 2 diabetesInternal medicineEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusMedicineBiochemistryEndocrine systemGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) serves as a link between ingested nutrients and insulin secretion. Because of the anti-diabetic properties exerted by GLP-1, several derivative drugs are currently in the market for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. Over the past few years, several cell lines have been established as useful models for the study of the GLP-1-secreting enteroendocrine L-cells. This review focuses on the murine GLUTag cell line, derived from colonic tumours of transgenic mice expressing large T antigen under the control of the proglucagon promoter. These cells are widely used to examine the effects of food components on GLP-1 secretion, as well as the signaling pathways underlying nutrient-induced GLP-1 release. The effects of different food components, as well as of nutrient-related signals, on GLP-1 secretion, and the protocols for the maintenance and use of the murine GLUTag L-cell line will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207