Edge-state transport in Floquet topological insulators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Floquet topological insulators are systems in which the topology emerges only when a time-periodic perturbation is applied. In these systems one can define quasienergy states which replace the equilibrium stationary states. The system exhibits its nontrivial topology by developing edge-localized quasienergy states which lie in a gap of the quasienergy spectrum. These states represent a nonequilibrium analog of the topologically protected edge states in equilibrium topological insulators which exhibit an edge conductance of $2{e}^{2}/h$. Here we explore the transport properties of the edge states in a Floquet topological insulator. In stark contrast to the equilibrium result, we find that the two-terminal conductivity of these edge states is significantly different from $2{e}^{2}/h$. This fact notwithstanding, we find that for certain external potential strengths the conductivity is smaller than $2{e}^{2}/h$ and robust to the effects of disorder and smooth changes to the Hamiltonian's parameters. This robustness is reminiscent of the robustness found in equilibrium topological insulators. We provide an intuitive understanding of the reduction of the conductivity in terms of a picture where electrons in edge states are scattered by photons. We also consider the Floquet sum rule [A. Kundu and B. Seradjeh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 136402 (2013)], which was proposed in a different context. The summed conductivity recovers the equilibrium value of $2{e}^{2}/h$ whenever edge states are present. We show that this sum rule holds in our system using both numerical and analytic techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".