MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 322: Role of T-Type Calcium Current in Cardiac Remodeling Probed with Genetically Engineered Knockout Mice

2007· article· en· W81419596 on OpenAlexaff
Khaï Le Quang, Frédéric Poulin, Marc‐Antoine Gillis, Philippe Comtois, Pierre Coutu, Jean‐Claude Tardif, Danshi Li, Paul Lévesque, Flavien Charpentier, Stanley Nattel

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyEjection fractionLigationIntracardiac injectionMyocardial infarctionKnockout mouseVentricular remodelingStimulationHeart failureEndocrinologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Previous studies suggested that T-type Ca 2+ -current (I CaT ) blockers suppress disease-related cardiac remodeling, but all available I CaT -blockers have non-specific actions on other currents and/or functions. To obtain a clearer sense of the role of I CaT in cardiac remodeling, we studied mice with the principal cardiac I CaT subunit (Cav3.1) knocked out. Methods: Adult male Cav3.1 knockout mice (KO) were compared with wild type (WT). LAD-ligation was performed to create anterior-wall myocardial infarction (MI). Echocardiography was used to evaluate cardiac performance at baseline, 2-w and 4-w post-MI. Intracardiac programmed stimulation was performed 4-w post-MI. Standard pacing protocols were used to determine atrial and ventricular electrophysiological properties and to induce arrhythmias. Results: Surface ECG parameters were examined in 10 KO and 10 WT mice prior to LAD ligation. At baseline, PQ interval was significantly longer in KO mice than in WT animals (44 ± 1 ms vs 40 ± 1 ms, respectively; p < 0.05); no significant differences were observed in RR, QRS or QTc intervals. At 10 minutes post-MI, WT (but not KO) mice showed increased heart rate (p = 0.002). Baseline echocardiography showed smaller LV fractional shortening (FS) and ejection fraction (EF) in KO mice compared with WT (34 ± 1% KO vs 42 ± 3% WT; 69 ± 2% KO vs 77 ± 3% WT; respectively, p < 0.05). At 4-w post-MI, FS and EF of KO mice were still smaller than WT mice (15.5 ± 1.6% vs 21.0 ± 1.5%; 37.4 ± 3.2% vs 48.1 ± 2.8%, respectively; p < 0.05). At baseline and 4-w post-MI, the contractility index (pressure-volume curves) was decreased in KO mice (p < 0.05). Intracardiac electrophysiological recordings revealed no differences in atrial and ventricular ERP or sinus node recovery time for WT vs KO. At 4-w post-MI, extrastimuli induced sustained atrial fibrillation (> 2 s) in 60% (6/10) KO mice, versus 17% (1/6) in WT (p = 0.05) and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 82% (9/11) of KO mice versus 17% (1/6) of WT (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Contrary to previous studies with (imperfectly selective) pharmacological agents having T-type Ca 2+ channel blocking actions, our findings suggests that reductions in I CaT do not favorably alter post-MI remodeling and may negatively affect cardiac function and arrhythmias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→