MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W816037396 · doi:10.18716/ojs/gefo/2014.2645

Transnational Maternal Genealogies in Contemporary Canadian Women’s Historical Novels

2024· article· en· W816037396 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tegan Zimmerman

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyNarrativeSubversionPostmodernismHistoryContext (archaeology)MainstreamGender studiesIdentity (music)LiteratureNationalismPoeticsSociologyAestheticsArtPoetryPolitical sciencePoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is a sustained analysis of transnational maternal genealogies in contemporary Canadian women’s historical novels written in English. In contrast to conventional historical novels which privilege the lives of men, women’s historical novel centralizes women’s lives. Experiences such as pregnancy, rape, childbearing and rearing, breast cancer, and so on are prioritized. My article concentrates on the creation and expression of transnational maternal genealogies as manifest in an increasing number of contemporary historical novels by Canadian women. Beginning with Joy Kogawa’s seminal novel Obasan, published in 1981, I trace the trajectory of this gendered genre to recent times with Padma Viswanathan’s The Toss of a Lemon. Transnational maternal genealogies differ from other dominant trends in the genre such as masculinist mainstream historiography and “historiographic metafiction” because the genre contends that gender and a link to one’s maternal past, not the national context, is paramount to lived experience. Furthermore, transnational female characters challenge “traditional boundaries of historical fiction,” Canada’s official history, and claims as to who is and who is not Canadian. Despite the critical acclaim and notoriety many Canadian women novelists enjoy, this genre has attracted little scholarship, thus this article partakes in the critical work which can and should be done to remedy this gap.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0090.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversitäts- und Stadtbibliothek KölnSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207