Comparison of NMR structures and model-membrane interactions of 15-residue antimicrobial peptides derived from bovine lactoferricinThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 7th International Conference on Lactoferrin: Structure, Function, and Applications, and has undergone the Journal's usual peer review process.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LFB (FKCRRWQWRMKKLGA-HN2) is a 15-residue linear antimicrobial peptide derived from bovine lactoferricin, which has antimicrobial activity similar to that of the intact 25-residue disulfide-cyclized peptide. Previous alanine-scan studies, in which all of the residues in LFB were individually replaced with Ala, showed that the 2 tryptophan (Trp) residues of LFB were crucial to its antimicrobial activity. When either Trp6 or Trp8 was replaced with Ala (LFBA6 and LFBA8, respectively), these 2 peptides were almost devoid of antimicrobial activity. We determined the structures of LFB, LFBA6, and LFBA8 bound to membrane-mimetic SDS micelles using NMR spectroscopy, and studied their interactions with different phospholipid-model membranes. The membrane interactions of LFB exhibited little correlation with its antimicrobial activity, suggesting that the mechanism of action of LFB involves intracellular targets. However, the much higher antimicrobial activity of LFB compared with LFBA6 and LFBA8 might result, in part, from the formation of energetically favorable cation-pi interactions observed only in LFB. Information about the importance of Arg and Trp cation-pi interactions will provide insight for the future design of potent antimicrobial peptidomimetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".