Bibliographic record
Abstract
While trade and commerce are vital for the financial development of Canada, high volumes of heavy truck traffic introduce a considerable strain on urban traffic management. The Metro Vancouver area features numerous marine and rail intermodal terminals highly occupied with Asia-Pacific goods movement. Heavy truck traffic associated with the Asia Pacific Gateway is anticipated to increase significantly over the next 10 years. In order to better cope with this trend, TransLink, in collaboration with Transport Canada, the BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, and Port Metro Vancouver commissioned a study to improve the movement of Asia Pacific goods along the region's major road corridors through the inclusion of technology. The purpose of the study was to devise a strategy for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) implementation to improve the efficiency, safety and security of truck-related goods movement in the region by defining and planning the creation of Smart Corridors. These Smart Corridors will facilitate the transportation of goods between various regional points of entry and major destinations (such as inter-modal yards and logistics centres) in the Metro Vancouver area, and serve to alleviate existing and future issues related to commercial goods movement, as well as its effect on general purpose traffic. The study included identification of candidate applications and technologies and the formation of a staged implementation schedule by considering prioritization of corridors and ITS technologies, focusing on the most urgent needs in the most troubled areas and corridors, while considering various organizational issues and the stakeholders affected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".