MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Preliminary assessment of toxicity in an expanded access trial with subpopulation analysis

2007· article· en· W81857156 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Gore, Camillo Porta, Stéphane Oudard, Georg A. Bjarnason, Daniel Castellano, Cezary Szczylik, Paul N. Mainwaring, Patrick Schöffski, Brian I. Rini, Ronald M. Bukowski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSunitinibInternal medicineRenal cell carcinomaPopulationExpanded accessTyrosine-kinase inhibitorConcomitantGastroenterologyCancerSurgeryOncologyUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5010 Background: Sunitinib is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs and PDGFRs, approved multinationally for advanced RCC. The primary aim of this international, open-label trial was to provide sunitinib to mRCC pts who failed =1 prior systemic therapy and were ineligible for other sunitinib trials or had no access to sunitinib before regulatory approval in their country. Methods: Eligibility criteria were minimized to broaden the enrolment population. Pts who were 18 yrs of age or older with histologically-confirmed mRCC received oral sunitinib 50 mg/day in 6-wk cycles (4 wks on Tx, 2 wks off). Physical exam, safety and concomitant meds were assessed every 4 wks. Results: As of Sept 1, 2006, 4,000 pts were enrolled from 181 sites in 36 countries; 2,158 pts (median age, 59 [19- 85]; male/female, 74%/26%) were included in this analysis. Baseline demographics included 106 pts (5%) with non-clear cell histology; 173 pts (8%) with brain mets; 158 pts (7%) with prior antiangiogenic Tx; and 288 pts (13%) with ECOG PS =2. Median Tx duration was 128 days (range 1- 2444) with interruptions in 17% of pts and dose reductions in 30%; 672 pts (31%) discontinued, of which 80 pts (12%) discontinued due to AEs. The median Tx duration was similar to the overall population regardless of age or site of metastatic disease at baseline (brain, bone, lung, liver, lymph nodes or other), but was longer in pts with ECOG PS 0/1 (154 days, range 1–2,444) than with ECOG PS =2 (83 days, range 1–449). The most common treatment-related AEs were diarrhea (39% any grade, 3% grade 3/4), fatigue (35%, 7%) and nausea (33%, 2%), the incidences of which were similar in pts regardless of age or site of baseline metastatic disease; overall, they occurred more frequently in pts with ECOG PS 0/1 vs. ECOG PS =2 (42% vs. 21%, 38% vs. 23%; and 34% vs. 25%, respectively), but differences in grade 3/4 severity were not observed. Median overall survival has not been reached; 19% of pts have died, the lowest incidence among pts with ECOG PS 0/1 (15%) and highest in pts with ECOG PS =2 (43%) and brain mets (34%). Conclusions: Preliminary observations suggest that sunitinib is associated with acceptable tolerability in an expanded access trial regardless of age or site of baseline metastatic disease. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.231
GPT teacher head0.523
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207