Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Quality of service in heterogeneous wired/wireless networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
QShine 2006 is the third annual conference on Quality of Service (QoS) in Heterogeneous Wireless/Wireline Networks. The conference addresses interdisciplinary issues in wireless/wireline networks, with quality of service as the main theme. Drawing on the synergy of all members of the organizing committees, QShine 2006 is poised to bring together innovative researchers, developers and practitioners from academia, industry and government laboratories to disseminate their significant findings and to expound their ideas and visions toward pushing the frontier of the research area through cross fertilization. We are fortunate to have two eminent research leaders, Dr. Nicholas F. Maxemchuk and Dr. Mischa Schwwartz, to deliver keynote speeches to set the tone of the conference.Since 2004, QShine has been a very successful series of conferences providing an International forum for the presentation and discussion of new research and ideas on Quality of Service (QoS) in heterogeneous wireless and wireline networks. Quality of Service research has expanded its scope, and continues to be an active research field in the networking community. It has been the tradition of past QShine conferences to represent inter-disciplinary and focused research, with an emphasis on innovation. Building on the successes of previous conferences in 2004 and 2005, QShine 2006 continues to bring together researchers, developers, and practitioners working in this area to discuss recent and innovative results, and to identify future directions and challenges in developing practical systems where predictable and controlled performance is a central requirement in heterogeneous and hybrid wireless networks.The Technical Program of QShine 2006 is, arguably, stronger than ever in the history of QShine. In addition to traditional QoS topics such as fairness, scheduling and admission control, the scope of this year's QShine has successfully included high-quality work in some new and emerging research directions, including wireless and sensor networks, overlay and peer-to-peer networks, and ultra-wideband wireless networks. As a result, new sessions have been included, such as Algorithms in Sensor Networks, Pricing, Incentives and Overlays, as well as Multimedia. The other sessions have covered the complete spectrum of Quality of Service research in wireless and wireline networks. We are also fortunate to have our keynote speakers, Professor Nicholas F. Maxemchuk and Professor Mischa Schwartz, to enlighten us on their own perspectives on the future of Quality of Service and networking research.Much effort by the Technical Program Committee has gone into putting together a high -quality technical program. The quality and quantity of submissions were both strong. The program committee has had a difficult task to select 49 papers among many high-quality deserving paper submissions. Similar to QShine of the previous years, the reviewing process has been completed within a very short period of time, in order to include the latest results in the area of Quality of Service in wireless networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".