Bibliographic record
Abstract
N-chloramide containing and primary amine-containing microgels were prepared by post-modification of thermosensitive microgels in alkaline bleach. The objective of this project was to develop simple strategies for preparation of functionalized microgels. N-chlorination of linear poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) in bleach at high pH resulted in a novel N-chloramide containing copolymer: poly(NIPAM-co-NIPAMCl). The chlorinated PNIPAM showed controlled phase transition temperature and oxidative ability. The N-chlorination of linear PNIPAM inspired the preparation of N-chloramide containing PNIPAM microgels in a similar way. The phase transition temperature of the resulted chlorinated microgels, which corresponds to the extent of N-chlorination, was affected by the reaction temperature and salt concentration. The reaction between the chlorinated microgels and glutathione is proposed as diffusion controlled. The N-chlorination of poly(N-isopropylmethacrylamide) (PNIPMAM) microgels in bleach was restricted, in comparison with PNIPAM microgels. The active chlorine content of chlorinated PNIPMAM microgels was about one-tenth of that of chlorinated PNIPAM microgels under the same N-chlorination condition. It is proposed that the high stability of PNIPMAM in bleach is a result of the electron-donating effect of methyl groups on PNIPMAM backbone. Hence, core-shell microgels with PNIPAM cores and poly(NIPAM-co-NIPMAM) shells showed improved colloidal stability after N-chlorination because the shell was less chlorinated and served as a steric stabilizer. Finally, primary amine-containing microgels were prepared via Hofmann rearrangement of copolymers of methacrylamide, which decomposed to give amines, and NIPMAM, which did not react. The method was further extended to give amphoteric microgels by including acrylic acid in the starting microgels. Although other approaches to aminated and amphoteric microgels have been developed, this approach is particularly attractive because of the ease of the reaction and the ability to control the microgel isoelectric points.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".