Myeloma progenitors in the blood of patients with aggressive or minimal disease: engraftment and self-renewal of primary human myeloma in the bone marrow of NOD SCID mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The myelomagenic capacity of clonotypic myeloma cells in G-CSF mobilized blood was tested by xenotransplant. Intracardiac (IC) injection of NOD SCID mice with peripheral cells from 5 patients who had aggressive myeloma led to lytic bone lesions, human Ig in the serum, human plasma cells, and a high frequency of clonotypic cells in the murine bone marrow (BM). Human B and plasma cells were detected in BM, spleen, and blood. Injection of ex vivo multiple myeloma cells directly into the murine sternal BM (intraosseus injection [IO]) leads to lytic bone lesions, BM plasma cells, and a high frequency of clonotypic cells in the femoral BM. This shows that myeloma has spread from the primary injection site to distant BM locations. By using a cellular limiting dilution PCR assay to quantify clonotypic B lineage cells, we confirmed that peripheral myeloma cells homed to the murine BM after IC and IO injection. The myeloma progenitor undergoes self-renewal in murine BM, as demonstrated by the transfer of human myeloma to a secondary recipient mouse. For 6 of 7 patients, G-CSF mobilized cells from patients who have minimal disease, taken at the time of mobilization or after cryopreservation, included myeloma progenitors as identified by engraftment of clonotypic cells and/or lytic bone disease in mice. This indicates that myeloma progenitors are mobilized into the blood by cyclophosphamide/G-CSF. Their ability to generate myeloma in a xenotransplant model implies that such progenitors are also myelomagenic when reinfused into patients, and suggests the need for an effective strategy to purge them before transplant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".