MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W825102994

Multiparton Interaction Models and Parton Shower Studies

2011· dissertation· en· W825102994 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Corke

Bibliographic record

VenueLund University Publications (Lund University) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParton showerPhysicsPartonParticle physicsLarge Hadron ColliderEvent generatorHadronTevatronQuantum chromodynamicsParametric statisticsNuclear physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis involves phenomenological models for describing high energy particle collisions. One class of these models, multiparton interactions (MPI), deals with the fact that when colliding two hadrons, it is possible for more than one pair of their constituents to interact. The other deals with parton showers, which are used to fill enhanced regions of phase space and give fully exclusive final states. These two components, when part of an event generation framework, help in the simulation of complete high energy collision events. Paper I presents a study of an extension to the MPI model, enhanced screening, where the amount of colour screening in an incoming hadron is increased in those events with a large amount of activity. Paper II presents another extension to the MPI model, rescattering. Commonly, in MPI models, interactions are between pairs of partons which originate from the incoming hadrons. With rescattering, an MPI can instead involve partons which come from previous interactions or shower branchings. Paper III studies the first emission of the parton shower. First, the interface to a next-to-leading generator, POWHEG-hvq, is examined. Second, a dampening of the first shower emission, based on general matrix element arguments is studied. Paper IV again deals with parton showers. Minor changes to the framework are outlined, before a kinematic comparison of the shower is made against 2 to 3 QCD real emission matrix elements. Finally, tunes of the generator are made to both Tevatron and LHC data. Paper V examines an extension to the impact parameter formalism of the MPI model, where the size of an incoming proton is varied depending on the x value of a parton being taken from it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLund University Publications (Lund University)Same topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207