MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W826072303

Equine-Facilitated Counselling and Women with Eating Disorders: Articulating Bodily Experience/Le Mieux-êTre Facilité Par le Cheval Dans le Counseling Chez Les Femmes Souffrant De Troubles De L'alimentation: Articuler L'expérience Corporelle

2014· article· fr· W826072303 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Hillary Sharpe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEating disordersContext (archaeology)Anorexia nervosaPsychologyBulimia nervosaAnorexiaAffect (linguistics)Binge-eating disorderPsychotherapistBinge eatingPsychiatryClinical psychologyMedicineHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of eating disorders has taken centre stage in recent years within helping professions and the larger public arena. The current diagnostic system (i.e., DSM-5; American Psychological Association, 2013) describes anorexia, bulimia, binge eating disorder (BED), and eating disorder not otherwise specified. Eating disorders affect a variety of populations, but they are largely issues that affect women of Western cultures (Blood, 2005). Although rates for these problems vary from context to context, it is estimated that between 1% and 3% of the popula- tion in Canada and the United States suffer from an eating disorder (Garfinkel et al., 1995; Levine, McVey, Piran, & Ferguson, 2012; Walters & Kendler, 1995). However, many researchers consider eating disorders to be more widespread than these rates suggest, due to the secretive nature of these problems (Maison, 1998) and issues inherent in the diagnostic system (Novotney, 2009; Swanson, Crow, Le Grange, Swendsen, & Merikangas, 2011). These problems exist on a spectrum ranging from socially acceptable behaviours such as diet and exercise to more extreme practices characteristic of what we define as eating disorders (RussellMayhew, 2007). The line between these problems is becoming increasingly blurred as evidenced by the rising number of individuals who live with what are termed subclinical eating disorders and the high preponderance of diagnostic crossover (e.g., from anorexia to bulimia; Eddy et al., 2008; Tozzi et al., 2005).Despite an explosion of research into the nature and treatment of eating disorders, these problems continue to be prevalent, chronic, debilitating, and sometimes life-threatening (Levine et al., 2012), suggesting that there is a gap in our existing knowledge base. Scholars and researchers in the eating disorder field have turned toward exploring the concept of embodiment to address this gap (e.g., Piran & Teall, 2012; Sanz & Burkitt, 2001; Stanghellini, Castellini, Brogna, Faravelli, & Ricca, 2012). Embodiment is a term that has been taken up within a variety of disciplines and refers to the many tacit ways that people go about their day-to-day lives. This includes sensations, visceral experiences, gait, posture, movements, and ones general engagement with the environment. While these modes of being often go unnoticed, they create the very means by which people construct their experiences (Shusterman, 2008). This lived and process-oriented approach has typically fallen to the wayside in favour of a cognitive-behavioural approach that emphasizes control of the body and the separation of human experience into discrete states that can be measured and objectified (Bigwood, 1991; Gremillion, 2002).In this research, I draw from an embodied understanding of eating disorders, which allows for a different grasp of these problems compared to more traditional conceptualizations. It is important to note that, in keeping with this embodied understanding, I use the terms attunement and corporeal Attunement refers to people s prereflective ways of existing in the world. Although embodiment and attunement are similar concepts, the key distinction is that attunement corresponds more closely to a relational process, or the ways that individuals alternately engage with and respond to their social and physical worlds. This can be understood as an ongoing circle existing between bodies and the world in a reciprocal dialogue; thus people are continually adjusting to a terrain or milieu that is always changing (Abram, 1996). This emerging discourse of the body encourages a shift from understanding eating disorders as individual pathologies, as espoused in the traditional medical treatment model. Instead, women who struggle with eating disorders and related problems are seen as people who accordingly express their life and relation to the world in active and communicative ways (Sanz & Burkitt, 2001).Similarly, the term corporeal refers to the bodily and communicative dimension of experience. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapySame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207