MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W827379500

Satellite-based constraints on seasonal methanol emissions from terrestrial landscapes

2012· preprint· en· W827379500 on OpenAlexaff
Dylan B. Millet, Kelley C. Wells, Lu Hu, Karen Cady‐Pereira, Y. Xiao, Mark W. Shephard, Cathy Clerbaux, L. Clarisse, Pierre‐François Coheur, Eric C. Apel, J. A. de Gouw, C. Warneke, H. B. Singh, Allen H. Goldstein, B. C. Sive

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2012
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceMethanolSCIAMACHYAtmospheric sciencesSatelliteMiddle latitudesRadiative forcingMethaneChemical transport modelTerrestrial ecosystemClimatologyTroposphereAtmospheric methaneAtmospheric chemistryEcosystemOzoneMeteorologyChemistryGeographyEcologyAerosolGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methanol (CH3OH) is the most abundant non-methane volatile organic compound in the atmosphere, with a global burden of 3-4 Tg, and is an important precursor of carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, and ozone. Here we employ an ensemble of new methanol measurements from nadir-viewing space-based sensors (TES, IASI) to better understand seasonal methanol emissions from terrestrial ecosystems worldwide. Analyzing one full year of satellite data, we find that the GEOS-Chem model, driven with MEGANv2.1 biogenic emissions, underestimates observed methanol concentrations throughout the midlatitudes in springtime, with the timing of the seasonal peak in model emissions 1-2 months too late. We attribute this discrepancy to an underestimate of emissions from new leaves in MEGAN, and apply the satellite data to better quantify the seasonal change in methanol emissions for midlatitude ecosystems. Our results enable a more realistic simulation of atmospheric methanol on the basis of IASI, TES, and ground-based measurements. We further employ the adjoint of GEOS-Chem in an inverse analysis to evaluate what constraints the satellite data can provide on methanol emission rates from different plant functional types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→