MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W83006640 · doi:10.2144/00291bc01

Color and Graphic Display (CGD): Programs for Multiple Sequence Alignment Analysis in Spreadsheet Software

2000· article· en· W83006640 on OpenAlex
Christian Delamarche

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioTechniques · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de Rennes 1McGill University
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftwareAlignment-free sequence analysisSequence (biology)Sequence alignmentSet (abstract data type)Multiple sequence alignmentSequence analysisDNA sequencingComputational biologyConsensus sequenceComputer graphics (images)Programming languageBiologyBase sequenceGeneticsPeptide sequenceDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interpretation of multiple sequence alignments is of major interest for the prediction of functional and structural domains in proteins or for the organization of related sequences in families and subfamilies. However, a necessity for the bench scientist is the use of outstanding programs in a friendly computing environment. This paper describes Color and Graphic Display (CGD), a set of modules that runs as part of the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to color and analyze multiple sequence alignments. Discussed here are the main functions of CGD and the use of the program to highlight residues of importance in a water channel family. Although CGD was created for protein sequences, most of the modules are compatible with DNA sequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it