Középkori Zsidó és Iszlám Racionalizmus (Kalam) = Jewish and Islamic Rationalist Thought (kalam) in the Middle Ages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kutatásom mindenek előtt a 10. századi iszlám és zsidó racionális teológia (kalam) kutatására irányult. Ennek keretében kutatásom első évében elkészítettem és sajtó alá rendeztem Szádja Gáon al-Fajjúmi, bagdadi zsidó gondolkodó főűvének magyar fordítását. A mű (bevezetővel, arab-héber-magyar filózófiai szótárral és Tatár György előszavával) Hittételek és Vélemények Könyve címmel a l'Harmattan kiadónál jelent meg. Ezen kívül három angol nyelvű publikációt írtam és jelentettem meg a múlt évben. (1) Where is Paradise? (The Notions of Afterlife and Otherworld in the 10th Century Islamic and Jewish Thought), in: Dionysius, Dalhousie University, Halifax, December 2007 (2) The Double Path of Knowledge (Epistemological Structures in the 10th Century Jewish and Islamic Thought), in: Monotheism and Diversity, P. Losonczi (ed), Kluwer, 2007 (3) The Finitude of the World and the Limits of Human Knowledge (The Philoponean Proofs in Medieval Jewish Epistemology), in: Migrating Texts, W. Sweet (ed.), Kluwer, 2008. | During the first year of my fellowship I prepared the Hungarian translation of the masterpiece of early medieval Jewish rational theology (kalam): Saadya Gaon's Book of Beliefs and Opinions. In my translation I have been relying on the original Judeo-Arabic text, and the final product of my work (420 pages) was published by l'Harmattan, Hittételek és Vélemények Könyve, in 2005. In the second (last year) of my fellowship I authored 3 articles, two of which are already published in Germany and Canada respectively. (1) Where is Paradise? (The Notions of Afterlife and Otherworld in the 10th Century Islamic and Jewish Thought), in: Dionysius, Dalhousie University, Halifax, December 2007 (2)The Double Path of Knowledge (Epistemological Structures in the 10th Century Jewish and Islamic Thought), in: Monotheism and Diversity, P.Losonczi (ed), Kluwer 2007 (3) The Finitude of the World and the Limits of Human Knowledge (The Philoponean Proofs in Medieval Jewish Epistemology), in: Migrating Texts, W. Sweet (ed.), Kluwer, 2008
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".