Changes to Family Dynamics When Living With Invisible Symptoms of Acquired Brain Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to explore the changes to family dynamics that result from invisible symptoms of acquired brain injury The perspective put forth is that of individuals living with invisible symptoms of acquired brain injury. This study is based on a thematic analysis of the findings from nine semi-structured interviews with individuals (aged 24-64 yrs.; 6 men, 3 women) who have been formally diagnosed with an acquired brain injury. The data is interpreted and discussed using a critical framework, specifically, Critical Disability Theory. The findings from this analysis illustrate how invisible symptoms such as cognitive impairments, memory loss, mood changes etc., of acquired brain injury affect family dynamics in relation to emotional roles, domestic roles, financial roles, and perception and treatment of the affected individual. These changes were either exacerbated or minimized by the assumptions, misconceptions and knowledge level of the individual’s family in relation to understanding brain injury and the ways in which disability can manifest. Also important to family relations are the perceptions of participants that they must prove that they do have a disability; the roles healthcare professionals play in the validation of the injuries, both to the individual and the family; and how powerfully dominant constructions of disability – and invisible acquired brain injury in particular – are ingrained in social discourse and impact upon family dynamics for people living with invisible acquired brain injury. Lastly, an important part of this research is a compilation of recommendations put forth by the participants for healthcare professionals to keep in mind when working with individuals who either are suspected of having or have an acquired brain injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".