Comment the Contiguous Zone as a Mechanism for Protecting the Underwater Cultural Heritage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The contiguous zone was institutionally recognized for the first time in the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone (TSC). The LOS Convention provided that the jurisdiction of the coastal State would also apply in the case of the protection of underwater cultural heritage. This chapter discusses coastal state jurisdiction over underwater cultural heritage in the contiguous zone as envisaged by the LOS Convention. In addition, it examines the related issue of whether the exercise of such jurisdiction presupposes the declaration of a contiguous zone or it applies automatically. Article 303(2) is of interest for the purposes of the current analysis, as it refers indirectly but clearly to the contiguous zone. As at 26 August 2005, 74 States had adopted 24-mile contiguous zones compatible with the LOS Convention, including the USA, Canada, France, Spain, Portugal, Cyprus and more recently Denmark. Keywords: 1958 Geneva Convention; Article 303(2); contiguous zone; LOS Convention; TSC; underwater cultural heritage
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".