MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W84261179

Impact Ejecta at the Mistastin Lake Impact Structure, Labrador, Canada

2011· article· en· W84261179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLunar and Planetary Science Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpact craterEjectaImpact structureGeologyGeochemistryGeomorphologyAstrobiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: One of the principal characteristics of impact events is the formation and emplacement of ejecta deposits. The compositional and physical characteristics of ejecta provide fundamental information about the shocked nature of target rocks and thus can provide one of the best and most accessible pieces of evidence for an impact origin of a structure [1] and provide a unique way to sample the sub-surface [2]. Impact ejecta is defined here as any target material, regardless of its physical state, that is transported beyond the rim of the transient cavity [2]. The original transient cavity reaches its maximum size during the excavation stage of crater formation, before rim collapse begins in the modification stage [3]. In complex craters, during the modification stage, rocks around the periphery of the bowl-shaped transient crater collapse downward and inward to form a series of terraces along the outer margin of the crater structure [1]. Most of the ejected material is deposited near the initial transient crater rim and can thus be found within the terraced region and beyond. Impact ejecta deposits, typically poorly preserved on Earth due to post-impact erosional processes, were recently identified in the rim region of the Mistastin Lake impact structure and are the focus of this study. Mistastin Lake Impact Structure: This impact structure, located in northern Labrador, Canada (55°53’N; 63°18’W), represents an intermediate-size, complex crater (28 km diameter) formed by a meteorite impact ~36 million years ago. The original crater has been differentially eroded; however, a subdued rim and distinct central uplift are still observed [4]. The inner portion of the Mistastin Lake impact structure is covered by the Mistastin Lake and the surrounding area is locally covered by soil/glacial deposits and vegetation. The topography directly surrounding the lake is slightly elevated in plateaus extending up to 5 km away from the shoreline. The crystalline target rocks of the Mistastin Lake region are dominated by granodiorite, mangerite, and anorthosite. Locally, allochthonous impactite units including impact melt and breccias are unevenly distributed around the lake and on Horseshoe Island (Fig. 1). Previous studies of the Mistastin Lake impactites have primarily focussed on the melt rocks (e.g., [4], [5]). This project builds on these studies and further evaluates the suite of impactite rocks in terms of their context within the crater structure and origin of their components. Fig. 1: Geology map (modified from [4], [5], and [6]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it