Toward a Musical Praxis of Justice: A Survey of Global and Indigenous Canadian Song in the Hymnals of the Anglican, Presbyterian, and United Churches of Canada through Their History
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The significance of brain temperature was investigated in patients with severe head injuries. In thirty patients in a state of coma due to severe head injury (Glasgow coma scale of less than 8), brain temperature (Tb), rectal temperature (Tr), and intracranial pressure (ICP) were measured. In 21 out of these patients, cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured by means of transcranial Doppler effect (TCD), and pulsatility index (PI) was calculated from TCD findings. The outcome was assessed by the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) 1 month after the head injury. The patients were classified into 4 groups according to the differences (delta T) between Tb and Tr. Group I (11 patients) was defined as always having a higher Tb than Tr, Group II (14) as always having a higher Tr than Tb, Group III (3) was as having no significant differences between Tb and Tr, and Group IV (2) was as having delta T change from plus to minus or from minus to plus during the course of monitoring. As regards the intracranial lesions, no significant differences among these groups were recognized. P.I, at 6 hours after operation, was 1.1 +/- 0.1 (N = 10) in Group I, and was 3.4 +/- 1.9 (N = 9) in Group II. The difference between these two values was statistically significant. The outcome of Group I was better than that of the other groups. The brain temperature is thought to reflect the CBF in the human brain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".