MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AUTODETERMINACIÓN EN SISTEMAS DEMOCRÁTICOS. EL CASO DE LA CONSULTA EN EUSKADI

2009· article· es· W84426460 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Vasca de Administración Pública / Herri-Arduralaritzarako Euskal Aldizkaria · 2009
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Immigration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La autodeterminación externa de los pueblos integrados en Estados liberal-democráticos es un tema aún poco tratado por la doctrina politológica. Hablamos de tal cuando, entre otras posibilidades, el territorio que se instala en ella piensa en la independencia como una de las potenciales salidas a sus relaciones actuales en el seno de dicho Estado. En los Estados del tipo indicado no está reconocida, en su Constitución, la posibilidad de la secesión de algunas de sus regiones; pero, tampoco está taxativamente prohibida, salvo que esta prohibición se deduzca de sintagmas como indisoluble unidad (art. 2 Constitución española) o que la soberanía de las regiones está sometida a la soberanía estatal (art. 3 Constitución de Suiza). Sin embargo, la Corte Suprema de Canadá ¿Renvoi 20.8.1998¿ ha abierto la posibilidad de que alguna Provincia de la Federación pueda optar por esa situación fi nal siempre que, y entre otros requisitos, lo decida por una mayoría clara. El pueblo vasco ¿Euskadi o la Comunidad Autónoma Vasca¿, desde 1990, viene dando pasos en algo que podemos considerar el embrión de un proceso de autodeterminación externa. Su relevancia como caso de referencia estriba en que se ve obligado a sortear obstáculos por la imposibilidad de acogerse a una normativa que permita avanzar. Sin embargo, existen pocas oportunidades y muchas y graves amenazas al proceso que termina en la frustrada propuesta de consulta popular. Tratamos de analizar el proceso vasco hasta su último estadio de la consulta popular. Estatu liberal-demokratikoetan bildutako herrien kanpoautodeterminazioa gutxitan tratatu izan du doktrina politologikoak. Kanpo- autodeterminazioa aipatzen dugu, besteak beste, aukera hori hartzen duen lurraldeak independentzia etsitzen badu estatu horren barruan gaur egun dauzkan harremanak aldatzeko aukeratako bat. Halako estatu horietan, konstituzioak ez du onartzen eskualde batzuek banantzeko aukera izaterik; alabaina, ez du zorrotz debekatzen, non eta debeku hori ez den deduzitzen zenbait sintagmatatik, adibidez, «batasun zatiezina» (Espainiako Konstituzioaren 2. artikulua), edo «eskualdeen burujabetasuna estatuaren burujabetzaren mende dago» (Suitzako Konstituzioaren 3. artikulua). Halere, Kanadako Auzitegi Gorenak ¿Renvoi, 1998.8.20¿ atea zabaldu du federazioko probintziaren batek burujabetza horretara jotzeko, betiere, eta beste betekizun batzuez gain, herritarren gehiengo argiak erabakitzen badu. Euskaldun herria ¿Euskadi edo Euskal Autonomia Erkidegoa¿, 1990. urtetik hona hasita dago kanpo-autodeterminazioaren prozesuaren enbrioia izan daitekeena abiarazten. Erreferentziazko kasu izateko arrazoia da oztopo mordoa dauzkala bidean, aurrera egiteko aukera emango dion araudirik ez daukala heltzeko. Alderantziz, aukera gutxi eta mehatxu ugari eta larriak dauzka, eta azkenean herri-kontsulta egiteko proposamenaren porrota izan da emaitza. Euskal prozesua analizatzen du lan honek, azken pausora arte: herri-kontsulta. The external self-determination of peoples integrated within Liberal-democratic States is not a very studied topic by Political Science academy. We are refering to the population of a territory who thinks of independence as one of the potential solutions to its current relationships in the bosom of the mentioned State. In the aforementioned States, the possibility of secession by some of their regions is not acknowledged; but it is also not specifi cally prohibited, unless this prohibition is deduced from syntagms as indissoluble unity (art. 2 Spanish Constitution) or that Region¿s sovereignty is bound to the State¿s sovereignty (art. 3 Swiss Constitution). Nevertheless, the Canadian Supreme Court ¿Renvoi 20.8.1998¿ opened the door to some Federated province to opt for that fi nal situation providing that, among other conditions, it is decided by a large majority. The Basque people ¿Euskadi or the Basque Autonomous Community¿ have been taken steps to something that could be considered as the germ of a process to external self-determination. Its importance lies on the fact that it has to get round problems by the impossibility to avail from a legislation to move forward. However, there are few chances and many and serious threats to the process that ends in a frustrated proposal for a popular plebiscite. We try to analyze the Basque process as far as to the last step of popular plebiscite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it