MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W845365684

The Art of Happiness at Work

2014· article· en· W845365684 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Raymond Lemay

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinnovation journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHappinessSloganInjusticeBuddhismPublic sectorSociologyHuman resourcesPublic relationsManagementPolitical scienceLawEconomicsPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler The Art of Happiness at Work London: Hodder& Stoughton, 2003Reviewed by Raymond A. LemayIn the public sector and in human services particularly, human resources - employees - are the means to the end. The old Defasco steel ad slogan told us product steel. Our strength and, in the public sector where the product the crafting of the public good, the adage about the people likely more critical. So what about our people? Are they well enough to be the strength of the system that guarantees the public good? Recent surveys (AOL, 2011; Barrows & Wesson, 2001; Burch and Axworthy, 2010) suggest that not all public servants are satisfied with their roles, and these authors recommend systemic change, suggesting that the employer must reform its human resource practices. Organizational, employee and workplace wellness are strategies that put the onus on the employer to create conditions that promote healthier and happier employees.If there injustice, then I think inaction the wrong response.- The Dalai LamaIt would seem, however, that the Buddhist tradition, without refuting the possibility of systemic reform, would view such problems from a different and more personal perspective. The Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler weigh in on the issue of employee in a different and interesting way.The authors of this book had previously collaborated in 1998 on the book The art of Happiness: A Handbook for Living, the purpose of which was to convey to novices the basics of Tibetan Buddhist psychology:* The purpose of life happiness.* Happiness determined more by the state of one's mind than by one's external conditions, circumstances, or events - at least once one's basic survival needs are met.* Happiness can be achieved through the systematic training of our hearts and minds, through reshaping our attitudes and outlook.* The key to in our hands (p. 1).In this book they particularize the teaching to work; at bound to have an impact on one's life more generally: we spend a lot of time at work, and Cutler quotes researchers (Harter, Schmidt and Corey Keyes, 2003) who report that much as a fifth to a quarter of the variance in adult life satisfaction can be accounted for by satisfaction with work (p. 188: NB: all page references are to under review).The book, however, focuses only on the individual worker, happiness at generally from the standpoint of the worker, the employee, and measures they can take to become more satisfied at through their own efforts, by changing their outlook, increasing self-understanding.... (p. 206). The Dalai Lama adds that this is only part of the picture. The employer also, the management, the organization, all plays a role in setting the tone of the workplace environment, and have an impact on the of the employees, and of course if we are to discuss wider issues of ethics in business, the economy, and so on, that another thing... (p. 206)The book's nine chapters discuss various sources of (un)happiness at and the Dalai Lama proposes ways to address and rectify sources of unhappiness.Transforming Dissatisfaction at WorkThere are many sources of dissatisfaction at work, but a good place to start with oneself, and one's attitude. If one doesn't like a job, then one should change and get another job, or alternatively develop an attitude of contentment. There are undoubtedly worse jobs, and more trying situations. Indeed, one should come to the realization that there are a myriad of factors that make a job satisfying or not. Some of these factors (indeed many) are simply beyond our (or our boss') control. Cutler asserts that the Dalai Lama has an unsentimental (p. 33) view of life difficulties:There will always be problems in life. It just not possible to go through life without encountering problems. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.018
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œinnovation journalSame topicWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipFrench-language works237,207