Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler The Art of Happiness at Work London: Hodder& Stoughton, 2003Reviewed by Raymond A. LemayIn the public sector and in human services particularly, human resources - employees - are the means to the end. The old Defasco steel ad slogan told us product steel. Our strength and, in the public sector where the product the crafting of the public good, the adage about the people likely more critical. So what about our people? Are they well enough to be the strength of the system that guarantees the public good? Recent surveys (AOL, 2011; Barrows & Wesson, 2001; Burch and Axworthy, 2010) suggest that not all public servants are satisfied with their roles, and these authors recommend systemic change, suggesting that the employer must reform its human resource practices. Organizational, employee and workplace wellness are strategies that put the onus on the employer to create conditions that promote healthier and happier employees.If there injustice, then I think inaction the wrong response.- The Dalai LamaIt would seem, however, that the Buddhist tradition, without refuting the possibility of systemic reform, would view such problems from a different and more personal perspective. The Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler weigh in on the issue of employee in a different and interesting way.The authors of this book had previously collaborated in 1998 on the book The art of Happiness: A Handbook for Living, the purpose of which was to convey to novices the basics of Tibetan Buddhist psychology:* The purpose of life happiness.* Happiness determined more by the state of one's mind than by one's external conditions, circumstances, or events - at least once one's basic survival needs are met.* Happiness can be achieved through the systematic training of our hearts and minds, through reshaping our attitudes and outlook.* The key to in our hands (p. 1).In this book they particularize the teaching to work; at bound to have an impact on one's life more generally: we spend a lot of time at work, and Cutler quotes researchers (Harter, Schmidt and Corey Keyes, 2003) who report that much as a fifth to a quarter of the variance in adult life satisfaction can be accounted for by satisfaction with work (p. 188: NB: all page references are to under review).The book, however, focuses only on the individual worker, happiness at generally from the standpoint of the worker, the employee, and measures they can take to become more satisfied at through their own efforts, by changing their outlook, increasing self-understanding.... (p. 206). The Dalai Lama adds that this is only part of the picture. The employer also, the management, the organization, all plays a role in setting the tone of the workplace environment, and have an impact on the of the employees, and of course if we are to discuss wider issues of ethics in business, the economy, and so on, that another thing... (p. 206)The book's nine chapters discuss various sources of (un)happiness at and the Dalai Lama proposes ways to address and rectify sources of unhappiness.Transforming Dissatisfaction at WorkThere are many sources of dissatisfaction at work, but a good place to start with oneself, and one's attitude. If one doesn't like a job, then one should change and get another job, or alternatively develop an attitude of contentment. There are undoubtedly worse jobs, and more trying situations. Indeed, one should come to the realization that there are a myriad of factors that make a job satisfying or not. Some of these factors (indeed many) are simply beyond our (or our boss') control. Cutler asserts that the Dalai Lama has an unsentimental (p. 33) view of life difficulties:There will always be problems in life. It just not possible to go through life without encountering problems. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".