Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Local authorities in Canada do not play a constitutional role. They are not recognized as a third level of government in the federal structure, but as «creatures of the Provinces». They are incorporated to exercise delegated powers from the Provinces, the Territories and the Federation. This traditional and poor comprehension of the role of local authorities in the functioning of the State has been overcome in the last years. In 2001 the Supreme Court of Canada has recognized the principle of subsidiarity. This principle introduces in the Canadian legal order a new way of understanding the distribution of powers between the different levels of government. Local authorities are democratic legitimated bodies, and from this perspective they may play an important role representing the citizens in their territory and deciding the preferences in the rendering of services. This trend to recognize a wider local self-government to local bodies can be seen at the provincial and territorial level too. Municipal legislation has been reformed in the last years in many Provinces and Territories to recognize local authorities a greater sphere of powers. Lastly the standards used by judges in the judicial review are being developed too to assume this new trend of recognition of local self-government.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it