MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Propagation, Purification, and In Vivo Testing of Oncolytic Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Strains

2011· article· en· W84968995 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Simon Diallo, Markus Vähä‐Koskela, Fabrice Le Bœuf, John C. Bell

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOncolytic virusVesicular stomatitis virusVesicular StomatitisIn vivoVirologyBiologyVirusMicrobiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oncolytic viruses are self-amplifying therapeutics that specifically replicate in and kill cancer cells. We have previously shown that vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) can be used as an oncolytic virus. A strain of VSV harboring a mutation in the M protein (VSVΔ51) was found to exhibit enhanced tumor selectivity over its wild-type counterpart due to its inability to overcome antiviral programs in normal cells and due to the frequent defects in antiviral signaling pathways observed in the majority of tumors. VSVΔ51 can harbor transgenes, is easily propagated and purified to high titers, and shows potent oncolytic activity in several mouse models, including syngeneic CT26-lacZ subcutaneous colon carcinoma models. However, VSV-neutralizing antibodies targeting mainly the VSV-G surface glycoprotein arise within 3-5 days following the initial dose. This should be considered for strategies aiming at increasing the effectiveness of VSV through delivery of additional doses of virus or aiming to prolong VSV replication in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207