Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: To observe the morphological changes of the cupula after injecting gentamicin (GM) in the frog inner ear and to compare the changes of the cupula with those of the ampullary sensory cells. Methods: We injected 300 g (7.5 l) of GM into the inner ear of 30 bullfrogs using a microsyringe under ether anesthesia. The same amount of saline was injected into the other ear as control. The posterior cupula were observed at 3, 7, and 14 days after GM injection by stereoscopic microscope after being stained with India ink. We classified cupula changes into Grades 1 4 according to the degree of cupula shrinkage. Grade 1 is normal or slight change of the cupula such as the dip of the apex. Grade 2 is under 50%, and Grade 3 is 51 80% of cupula shrinkage. Grade 4 is more than 80% of shrinkage or absence of the cupula. After removing the cupula, the sensory epithelia of the posterior canal were immediately fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution and were assessed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). We classified the sensory cell changes into Grades 1 4 according to the extent of sensory cell damage. Grade 1 is damaged sensory cell area smaller than 20% of the total area. Grade 2 is damage of 21 50%, Grade 3, 51 80% and Grade 4, more than 80%. he correlation between the changes in the cupula and sensory cells was evaluated. Results: 1. Changes at 3 days after GM injection Normal or slightly changed cupula (grade 1) were seen in 7 out of 10 cases. Grade 4 change, disappearance of the cupula was found in 3 cases. In these cases,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it