Fertility in Nepal 1981-2000 : levels, trends, and components of change
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in an ambulatory setting is controversial. However, most current studies show that with adequate criteria for patient selection and careful postoperative observation, these procedures can be safely done as outpatient surgery. This study was undertaken to reassess the safety of outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery and to reevaluate the current recommendations for postoperative care. A prospective study was undertaken to relate the incidence of significant complications, including hemorrhage, protracted emesis, and fever, to each postoperative hour. The study included 534 pediatric patients (age 14 or less) undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy. All 534 patients were observed for 5 postoperative hours, and 175 of the 534 patients were observed for 6 postoperative hours. To assess complications occurring in the first postoperative week, all attending surgeons involved in this study were asked to anonymously report the occurrence of hemorrhage, protracted emesis, and/or fever from the time of discharge through the seventh postoperative day. In this study, no complications were encountered during the fifth or sixth postoperative hours. These results indicate that it is both safe and appropriate to perform tonsil and adenoid surgery in the ambulatory setting. Furthermore, the current recommendation that patients remain under postoperative recovery room observation for 6 hours appears to be excessive. This observation period may be safely reduced to 4 hours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".