MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W85526645 · doi:10.5206/cie-eci.v35i1.9070

Disrupting Contemporary Child Slavery Through Organization Networks: The Possibilities and Barriers

2006· article· en· W85526645 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lynette Shultz

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative and International Education · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpansivePolitical scienceSociologyHumanitiesPublic relationsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increases in slavery have been identified in most countries in the world and are understood to be a global problem with local patterns and consequences. Education organizations, including schools, teacher organizations, as well as non-formal education organizations, have the potential to function as powerful partners in preventing and eliminating child slavery through the provision of quality education and also as locations of information sharing and action coordination. This study examines existing organization, inter-organization and organization–institution networked relationships to understand if and how education organizations have taken up an active role as sites to disrupt contemporary child slavery or to rehabilitate children removed from slavery. The study reveals four key barriers to successful utilization of education providers and provides new understandings of how to more effectively address the ever more expansive and violent practice of child slavery. Le redoublement de l'esclavage a été identifié dans la plupart des pays du monde et reconnu comme un problème mondial avec des conséquences et caractéristiques locaux. Les organisations scolaires, comprenant les écoles, les organisations des enseignants ainsi que d'autres organisations scolaires non formelles, ont la possibilité de fonctionner comme des partenaires puissants dans la prévention et l'élimination de l'esclavage des enfants en procurant une éducation de qualité et en servant comme les lieux d'échange de renseignements et de coordination d'actions. Cette étude examine la relation entre les membres du réseau déjà établi des organisations, inter-organisations et des institutions pour savoir si et comment les organisations scolaires prennent un rôle actif comme des sites, luttant contre l'esclavage contemporain des enfants, ou servant de centres de réadaptation aux enfants sauvés de l'esclavage. Cette étude montre les quatre barrières clés qui interdisent le succès du service des pourvoyeurs d'éducation et propose de nouvelles compréhensions pour montrer une voie plus efficace dans la lutte contre la pratique expansive et violente de l'esclavage des enfants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative and International EducationSame topicPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareFrench-language works237,207