MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W85579431

FUZZY BASED SPATIAL QUERY AND ANALYSIS IN AN URBAN INFORMATION SYSTEM

2002· article· en· W85579431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammad Sarpoulaki, Farhad Samadzadegan, Rahim Ababspour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSophisticationGeographic information systemInformation systemValuation (finance)PurchasingComputer scienceSpatial decision support systemPopulationUrban planningCityGMLDecision support systemBusinessGeographyEngineeringMarketingCivil engineeringVisualizationData miningCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With respect to the fact that nearly 60% of the world’s population live in the cities and regarding the inevitable structural complexities as well as the cultural and economical complications in the cities, the intervention of a sophisticated information management systems has become a real necessity. This means that powerful city planning and management tools based on spatial information are a real need of the present situation of the world. Decision making from land administration and property valuation to simple house transactions as well as transportation decisions in a city needs spatial information management tools such as GIS and UIS (Urban Information System). An Urban information system is now internationally acknowledged to be a suitable tool for improving the management and planning potentials for the people who live in urban areas. In spite of the level of the sophistication and the services which are provided by GIS and UIS for many users in the cities, one of the main problems associated with them are the fact that these systems can answer only limited number of questions and hence a partial solution to the problem may be obtained. For example decision for purchasing a house may need to be made based on the following queries: To be close to the shopping centers and schools, To be far from the main roads, To be far from the military camps, To have a medium area size, To have an affordable price. With regard to the fact that there are certain level of uncertainties in these queries, incorporating them in a conventional UIS is not possible. In order to increase the potentials of a UIS system to deal with these queries, it is necessary to incorporate the following concepts into the UIS system: (a) descriptive parameters should be expressed based on linguistic variables and (b) uncertainty levels of the queries should be modeled. The method that is proposed in this paper takes advantage of the concept of the fuzzy logic to solve the above mentioned complications. To verify the proposed idea, the problem of selecting and purchasing an appropriate house is considered as a case study. To model this problem based on the fuzzy reasoning approach, in the first stage linguistic variables for decision making to buy a house is defined. In the next step the membership functions with respect to the linguistic rules for describing an ideal house is determined. These are then embedded into a fuzzy reasoning structure. The fuzzy reasoning structure is Mamdani type in which the position, dimensions, cost, and other properties of a house are defined as the input variables and the user’s definition for an appropriate house is defined as the output variables. The required information layers are extracted from 1:2000 scale digital map of the city of Tehran. These information include: educational centers, entertainment areas, medical centers, etc. The descriptive information such as the property valuation, position etc. are also extracted form existing data. The preliminary tests on the implemented fuzzy data management system indicate the superiority of our proposed method over the conventional systems. Symposium on Geospatial Theory, Processing and Applications, Symposium sur la theorie, les traitements et les applications des donnees Geospatiales, Ottawa 2002

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207