Therapeutic strategies, including a high surgical ligation rate, for patent ductus arteriosus closure in extremely premature infants in a North American centre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To document the rate of surgical ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in extremely premature infants who had received more than one course of indomethacin. Outcomes were compared among three subgroups (ligation, further indomethacin and no further treatment) of infants who received at least one course of indomethacin, and between two subgroups (one course of indomethacin and more than one course) among infants who underwent ligation. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of all 23 weeks+0 days to 26 weeks+6 days' gestational age infants with a PDA born between 1994 and 2005 was performed. Secondary outcomes were compared among the subgroups. RESULTS: The final study population consisted of 196 extremely premature infants with a PDA. The rate of surgical ligation in the 88 infants who received more than one course of indomethacin was 64%. The ligation subgroup, in comparison with the no further treatment subgroup, spent a greater median time on mechanical ventilation (39 versus 29 days, P<0.001) and in hospital (115 versus 92 days P=0.002), while trending toward lower mortality (18% versus 40%, P=0.07). The PDA closed following the first course of indomethacin in only 20% of infants. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of extremely premature infants receiving more than one course of indomethacin underwent surgical ligation. Repeated indomethacin courses were generally well tolerated, but were mostly unsuccessful. Ligation appears to have potential risks and benefits. A randomized trial should be performed after studies define a hemodynamically significant PDA that will result in morbidity and/or mortality unless treated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".