Patterns of macrozoobenthic production in the deep Arctic Ocean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the Arctic Ocean shifting towards a system with a seasonal ice cover solely, Arctic marine ecosystems are facing new challenges. Deep-sea macrobenthic communities are ideal integrators of the upcoming changes as they rely in their nutrition almost entirely on the input from upper layers and hence mirror changes of surface production in their own dynamics. But as benthic studies of the deep Arctic Ocean are scarce we are lacking reliable baseline information on the “pre-change” system state. To overcome this obstacle we combined legacy data from the past 20 years, as well as recent field studies in our approach. We investigated the relationship of standing stock, productivity (P/B) and secondary production (P) of macrobenthos with water depth, geographical latitude and sea ice concentration along a transect from Fram Strait up to the high Arctic basins. Community P/B and P were estimated using the multi-parameter ANN model developed by Brey (2012). Our results confirm the previously described negative relationship of water depth and macrofauna standing stock in the Arctic deep-sea (Bluhm et al. 2011). Furthermore we could show that increasing sea-ice concentration and latitude correlated with decreasing standing stock and P of < 75 mg C m-2 y-1. Stations under influence of the marginal ice zone (MIZ) showed much higher standing stock and P (400-1400 mg C m-2 y-1) - even at depths up to 3700 m. We conclude that particle flux is the key factor structuring benthic communities in the deep Arctic Ocean, explaining both the low values in the ice-covered basins and the high values found along the MIZ. With the ongoing trend of a northward migrating seasonal ice zone carbon fluxes will shift accordingly and Arctic areas that are fueled by high primary production now may experience strong decline in the future. More northern and currently food limited areas on the other hand will probably benefit from the new situation, as deep-sea communities can react very fast on new food input and would so potentially form new hotspots of benthic secondary production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".