Bibliographic record
Abstract
A member who has disappeared may precipitate an urgent crisis in a family , and with one million persons reported missing each year among the total population of the United States and Canada, this hurtful family problem becomes a serious social problem approaching the magnitude of a nationalcrisis.An investigation was made to determine and evaluate the existing organized agencies whose purpose is to lend assistance to families in the form of search and counseling.Based on a case study involving personal experience,1 added insights were gained into a family's experience of disorientation when a member leaves suddenly.A continuing and frustrating problem facing the family may be the question of the thoroughness of the agency because of lack of understanding of their purpose, procedures they, use, and failure of the agencies to disclose information on what has been done.Data was collected and tabulated on the aid rendered by government, professional, and charitable agencies and an analysis was made of the extent of each agency's involvement and the kinds of, cases each accepts.The emphasis in this study was on missing youth.It was found that a few agencies have realized the opportunity that is offered for -counseling the family for the return and reconciliation, besides conducting a search.They have helped both the runaway and other members recognize the causes of alienation and the need to build new empathy and understanding so a member will never, again want to "lose" his family.It was concluded that families and agencies both should be encouraged to continue a search.Some may not want to be "found" but many who have left home want to return, although they feel trapped in their decision by pride or despair.Whether or not a family should continue a search is voiced in one runaway youth's poignant letter ". . .keep looking."The investigation suggests further need for more direction-in the establishment of a national clearing house for information and in providing readily available counseling services to prevent troubled persons from us-ing disappearance as a solution to family problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".