MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W862505036

Freedom's Seekers: Essays on Comparative Emancipation

2014· article· en· W862505036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shirley J. Portwood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Illinois State Historical Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmancipationDiasporaSeekersHistoryState (computer science)SociologyGender studiesLawPolitical sciencePolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seekers: Essays on Comparative Emancipation. By Jeffrey R. KerrRitchie. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University, 2013. Pp. 272, maps, notes, bibliography, index. Cloth, $35.95).Freedom's Seekers: Essays on Comparative Emancipation, by Jeffrey R. KerrRitchie, looks at slaves and self-emancipated slaves in a global perspective, cutting a broad swath chronologically, geographically, and topically. Kerr-Ritchie examines the eighteenth century and the age of revolutionary emancipation through the final abolition of slavery in Cuba and Brazil during the late nineteenth century.... The epilogue extends the analysis into our contemporary era (pp. xi-xii). The author explores five continents, including North South Europe, Africa, and Asia, although the principal focus is upon the African diaspora in North primarily in the United States. Ritchie opens with a question, which is also the title of the introduction: Was U.S. Emancipation Exceptional? Fie addresses this questions in six chapters entitled Self-Emancipation across North America, Slave Soldiers, Slave Revolt across Borders, Ward and the Making of an Imperial Subject, Freedwomen and Freed Children, and Freedom's First Generation. The epilogue Freedom's Seekers Today looks at millions of unfree workers throughout the world, including those currently in the United States. Throughout the work, Kerr-Ritchie challenges earlier scholars' assertions that U.S. experiences of slavery and emancipation were unique. He argues that viewing these subjects across national boundaries reveals that the American experience of slavery and emancipation were similar in many respects to those in other countries, although there were important differences as well.Kerr-Ritchie notes that slaves in the United States crossed into the free lands of Spanish Florida, Canada, and Mexico in search of freedom, while slaves in coastal West Africa escaped to Lagos, a free, British-controlled port city. Whether in North America or Africa, some escaped slaves sought to assist others in attaining freedom whether by aiding individual escapees or by becoming involved in organized abolitionist activism. Escaped slaves Samuel Ringgold Ward and Henry Bibb, as well as freeborn Mary Ann Shadd, left the U.S. and moved to Canada, where all three became important figures in the abolitionist movement that assisted slaves from the U.S. to gain their freedom and settle in Canada.The author finds that women and children who gained their freedom were larger proportions of the population than were men in various countries of the Caribbean, Indian Ocean nations, and the United States. As well, once free, women and children were less likely than men to work producing cash crops; they were more likely than men to produce for home consumption and for the local marketplace. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Illinois State Historical SocietySame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207