MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W86662746

A framework for completely separating the presentation and logic of Web-based applications.

2002· article· en· W86662746 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shuling. Nie

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePresentation (obstetrics)World Wide WebInformation retrievalMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of the Internet and the World Wide Web (WWW) has grown at a phenomenal rate. The Web has become the solution for information exchange, user interaction and business processing. However, building dynamic, interactive and maintainable Web-based applications is not an easy task. Technologies currently used for Web presentation generation do not separate the presentation and logic. This requires people of two different skill sets to be involved at the same time, therefore applications are difficult to develop and maintain. In recent years, several frameworks have been developed to remedy the problem. But they all have some limitations and still cannot completely separate the application presentation from its logic. The current study attempts to provide an approach of completely separating the presentation and logic of Web-based applications by extending the traditional Model-View-Controller architecture. The research includes two parts. The first part provides a template language for representing Web pages containing dynamic contents without including application logic. The second part provides a framework that integrates the dynamically generated information with the predefined Web templates to generate Web page on the fly. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2002 .N54. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 40-06, page: 1551. Adviser: Indra Tjandra. Thesis (M.Sc.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2002.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicMultimedia Communication and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207