MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W86713777

Ayn Rand’s Aesthetics: Preserving the Glamor of Hollywood’s Silent Screen

2010· article· en· W86713777 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elizabeth Blake

Bibliographic record

VenueGermano-Slavica · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicAyn Rand and Brontë studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHollywoodObjectivismCollectivismRomanceArtArt historyCountercultureLiteratureIndividualismLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by screen images of America that she viewed in St. Petersburg, Russia, Ayn Rand arrived in Hollywood in 1926 to pursue a career in the burgeoning movie industry. Her interest in film spanned her lifetime, as evidenced by her early Russian film writings, her screenplays, her participation in the film adaptation of The Fountainhead and her unfinished teleplay of Atlas Shrugged . However, she experienced great professional frustration when the movies of her youth embodying romantic, glamorous heroes on the silent screen were supplanted by movies celebrating the common man during the Depression Era. Wary of collectivist images on the silver screen, Rand testified before HUAC, produced The Fountainhead , and worked on the teleplay of her final novel in an effort to promote screen images of Americanism that had once served as her “Atlantis” while she was trapped in the “hell” of Soviet Russia in the 1920s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGermano-SlavicaSame topicAyn Rand and Brontë studiesFrench-language works237,207