MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W869617475 · doi:10.1139/y05-158

NPY, ET-1, and Ang II nuclear receptors in human endocardial endothelial cellsThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled The Nucleus: A Cell Within A Cell.

2006· review· en· W869617475 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Danielle Jacques, Sawsan Sader, Claudine Perreault, Dima Abdel-Samad, Farah Jules, Chantale Provost

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec
KeywordsReceptorNucleusNeuropeptide Y receptorCell biologyBiologyG protein-coupled receptorHomeostasisEndocrinologyInternal medicineNeuropeptideBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), endothelin-1 (ET-1), and angiotensin II (Ang II) are peptides that are known to play many important roles in cardiovascular homeostasis. The physiological actions of these peptides are thought to be primarily mediated by plasma membrane receptors that belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily. However, there is increasing evidence that suggests the existence of functional G-protein-coupled receptors at the level of the nucleus and that the nucleus could be a cell within a cell. Here, we review our work showing the presence in the nucleus of the NPY Y(1) receptor, the ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, as well as the AT(1) and AT(2) receptors and their respective ligands. This work was carried out in 20-week-old fetal human endocardial endothelial cells. Our results demonstrate that nuclear Y1, AT(1), and ET(A) receptors modulate nuclear calcium in these cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207