MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W869617475 · doi:10.1139/y05-158

NPY, ET-1, and Ang II nuclear receptors in human endocardial endothelial cellsThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled The Nucleus: A Cell Within A Cell.

2006· review· en· W869617475 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Danielle Jacques, Sawsan Sader, Claudine Perreault, Dima Abdel-Samad, Farah Jules, Chantale Provost

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec
KeywordsReceptorNucleusNeuropeptide Y receptorCell biologyBiologyG protein-coupled receptorHomeostasisEndocrinologyInternal medicineNeuropeptideBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), endothelin-1 (ET-1), and angiotensin II (Ang II) are peptides that are known to play many important roles in cardiovascular homeostasis. The physiological actions of these peptides are thought to be primarily mediated by plasma membrane receptors that belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily. However, there is increasing evidence that suggests the existence of functional G-protein-coupled receptors at the level of the nucleus and that the nucleus could be a cell within a cell. Here, we review our work showing the presence in the nucleus of the NPY Y(1) receptor, the ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, as well as the AT(1) and AT(2) receptors and their respective ligands. This work was carried out in 20-week-old fetal human endocardial endothelial cells. Our results demonstrate that nuclear Y1, AT(1), and ET(A) receptors modulate nuclear calcium in these cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207