MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 246: Incidence and Outcomes of Rearrest Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

2013· article· en· W87103408 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David D. Salcido, Matthew L. Sundermann, Allison C Koller, James J. Menegazzi

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Emergency medicineInternal medicineCardiologyIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rearrest (RA) occurs when a patient experiences cardiac arrest after successfully achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The incidence and outcomes of RA following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have been estimated in limited local studies. We sought to investigate the incidence and outcomes of RA over a broad geographic area. Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board. We obtained case data from EMS-treated, non-traumatic OHCA from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, a multi-site clinical research network conducting population level surveillance of OHCA in 11 cities in the US and Canada. The study cohort comprised all OHCA cases surveilled between 2006 and 2008 at ROC sites and having prehospital ROSC. We used three methods to ascertain RA incidence among these cases: direct signal analysis, indirect cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) process analysis, and emergency department arrival vital status. RA incidence was estimated as the proportion of cases with ROSC that experience RA. Regional RA estimates were compared with the Chi-Squared test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between RA and survival to hospital discharge. Results: Out of 18,937 cases of EMS-assessed OHCA captured between 2006 and 2008, 11,456 (60.5%) cases were treated by EMS and 4,396 (38.4%) had prehospital ROSC. Of these, sufficient data were available for RA ascertainment in 3,253 cases, with 568 (17.5%) experiencing RA. Regional RA incidence varied significantly from 10.2% to 21.2% (p < 0.001). RA was significantly inversely associated with survival (OR: 0.19, 95%CI: 0.14 - 0.26). Conclusions: In this geographically broad and inferentially conservative analysis, RA occurred on average in 1 of every 6 successfully resuscitated patients, though incidence varied significantly across 10 sites in North America. RA was found to be inversely associated with survival to hospital discharge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→