MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W873284331

No place like home: Sexuality, community, and identity among street-involved “queer and questioning᾿ youth (Il n'y a rien comme chez soi : Sexualité, communauté, et identité chez les jeunes « gais et en quête d'identité » dans la rue)

2007· article· fr· W873284331 on OpenAlexaffabout
Suzanne de Castell, Jennifer Jenson

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesEthnographyQueerHuman sexualityIdentity (music)Participatory action researchGender studiesEthnologyAnthropologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. This paper reports on a short-term ethnographic participatory action research project that engaged urban Canadian, street-involved “queer and questioning᾿ youth in a multi-media enabled inquiry into peer housing and support needs. The “Pridehouse Project᾿ (http://www.sfu.ca/pridehouse) was initiated by, and accountable to, a community-based housing support group. These responsibilities raised central critical questions about education, epistemology, and ethics in identity-based, socially activist, research. The dual role of ethnography as both research and pedagogy is here illustrated, and the educational value of productive activity-based learning in non-formal settings, particularly for youth inhabiting the margins of mainstream social life, is argued for. Il n’y a rien comme chez soi : sexualite, communaute, et identite chez les jeunes « gais et en quete d'identite » dans la rue  Resume. Cet essai decrit un projet de recherche action ethnographique participative a court terme qui a implique des jeunes « gais et en quete d’identite » canadiens urbains lors d’une enquete multimedia au sujet des logements d’entraide et des besoins de soutien. Le Pridehouse Project (http://www.sfu.ca/pridehouse) a ete mis sur pied par un groupe d’entraide au logement fonde sur la communaute et ce projet est responsable devant ce groupe. Les responsabilites du projet ont souleve des questions critiques et essentielles a propos de l’enseignement, de l’epistemologie et de l’ethique au sein de la recherche active sociale fondee sur l’identite. Le double role de l’ethnographie en tant que recherche et pedagogie est illustre ici, tout comme est discutee la valeur educative de l’apprentissage productif articule sur des activites dans un cadre informel, particulierement pour les jeunes en marge de la vie sociale conventionnelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGillSame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207