FAMILY LITERACY AND CULTURAL IDENTITY: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF A FILIPINO FAMILY IN CANADA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This inquiry uses ethnographic methods to examine the relationship between literacy practices and the construction of cultural identity in a Filipino immigrant family in Canada. The study was conducted by a researcher who is herself an immigrant to Canada from Asia. The literate lives of the six people of the Holman family indicate that literacy is not just an individual construct, but a more complex concept that involves family relationships that are embedded in cultural identity. lndividual identity is expressed in the intersecting ways the six family members (a grandmother, two parents, and three children) relate to each other and is manifested through their individual literacy behaviors. The individuals do not share the same perspectives on their cultural identity. lnstead, significant diversity exists among the family members across the generations. By presenting a close-up picture of the intersecting relationships between the literacy practices and cultural identity in a typical immigrant family, this study opens gateways for educators to understand immigrant children and their families' literacy and way of lfe in Canada, and informs classroom practices that affirm learners' diverse backgrounds. RESUME Cette recherche realisee a l'aide de methodes ethnographiques porte sur le lien qui existe entre les pratiques d'alphabetisation et l'acquisition d'une identite culturelle dans une famille d'immigrants philippins etablis au Canada. L'auteur de l'etude, d'origine asiatique, a elle-meme emigre au Canada. Le mode de vie alphabetisee des six membres de la famille Holman n'est pas une construction individuelle, mais un concept plus complexe qui fait intervenir les relations familiales inherentes a l'identite culturelle. L'identite individuelle s'exprime dans le mode d'interaction des six membres de la famille, qui comprend la grand-mere, les deux parents et les trois enfants. Cette identite se manifeste dans les comportements individuels de litteratie. Les membres de la famille ne partagent pas tous le meme point de vue sur leur identite culturelle et d'importantes divergences existent entre les opinions des membres de differentes generations. En presentant une analyse detaillee de l'interaction des pratiques d'alphabetisation et de l'identite culturelle dans une famille d'immigrants type, cette etude permettra aux educateurs de mieux comprendre les questions liees a l'alphabetisation et au mode de vie des enfants d'immigrants et des membres de leur famille et inspirera des pratiques pedagogiques fondees sur la diversite des horizons culturels des eleves
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".