MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Методологические подходы к анализу социальной ситуации развития умственно отсталого подростка

2013· article· en· W88252 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Жданова Оксана Владимировна

Bibliographic record

VenueСпециальное образование · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology of Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologySociologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Between January 1969 and February 1975, 344 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus were managed primarily at the Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto. One hundred sixty-eight (168) of the patients were treated palliatively and 176 of the patients were treated by radical doses of radiation, surgical resection or both. Survival of the radical treatment group was biphasic, the steeper component being identical to the survival of the palliative treatment group, thereby representing a group of patients that did not respond to radical treatment. Analysis of pretreatment assessment parameters indicated that all patients with T1 lesions (length less than or equal to 5 cm, circumference incomplete) and all patients with Stage I disease responded to treatment. Patients who were female, age greater than or equal to 70 years, N0 or had well differentiated squamous cell histology, responded to treatment in at least 80% of cases. No patient with extralymphatic distant metastases responded to treatment. The presence of other major disease did not affect response to treatment. Thirty patients had surgical resections and their survival was not significantly greater than the 146 patients who had radical radiation alone. Survival analysis revealed an optimum range of nominal standard dose (NSD) of 1602--1714 rets (median 1679 rets) for patients treated by radiation alone. An optimum port size (area) of 100--140 cm2 was observed for patients receiving 5000 rads and supervoltage irradiation gave a significantly improved survival in comparison with megavoltage irradiation. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of patients treated by radical doses or radiation developed esophageal strictures postradiation and on the basis of radiological, endoscopic or histological evidence 75% of these strictures were considered to be associated with the persistence of malignancy. On the basis of postmortem examinations (32) and death certificates there was overall an 80% failure to control the disease locally and 95% of strictures were associated with persistence of malignancy in the esophagus. Thirty-one of the 146 patients receiving radical radiation alone had palliation for esophageal obstruction following radiotherapy. The construction of a physiological bypass (e.g., colon) resulted in a mean survival of 215 days which was much longer than the survival observed with rigid esophageal tubes (35 days) or gastrostomy tubes (58 days).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.076

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueСпециальное образованиеSame topicPsychology of Development and EducationFrench-language works237,207