Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wyeth Research (formerly Wyeth-Ayerst Research) is developing the sirolimus (rapamycin) analog CCI-779 as a potential treatment for various cancers [320924]. By November 2001, phase III trials had been initiated [428972], [429576]. In October 2001, Raymond James predicted filing in 2003, with a potential launch in 2005 [426718]. In March 2002, CCI-779, was designated for fast-track development by the FDA for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma after failure of initial therapy [442535]; at this time phase III trials for renal cell carcinoma and phase II trials for various solid tumors were ongoing [444030]. In March 2002, Wyeth revealed that filing was anticipated for 2004/2005 [443491]. In June and August 2001, Lehman Brothers predicted sales of US $40 million ($20 million in the US) in 2003, rising to US $75 million ($38 million in the US) in 2004 [418901], [420809]. In October 2001, analysts at Raymond James expected potential sales of the product at US $250 million [426718]. In May 2002, a patent (WO-00240000) was published claiming CCI-779 to be useful for the treatment of cancers of various origins, including renal, breast, cervical, uterine, head and neck, lung, prostate, pancreatic, ovarian, colon, lymphoma and melanoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".