MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W8900158 · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.43.26779

Picasso au temps du DVD

2009· article· en· W8900158 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean Larose

Bibliographic record

VenueVie des arts · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
KeywordsPICASSOArtComputer scienceVisual artsHumanitiesPainting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-headed scallop myosin (shM) was prepared by papain digestion of filamentous scallop myosin and purified by hydrophobic interaction chromatography. The shM preparation consisted of equimolar amounts of polypeptides corresponding to an intact heavy chain, rod chain, essential light chain, and regulatory light chain. In electron micrographs the shape of shM showed the presence of a single head domain to which a normal looking rod was attached. Myosin and shM bound Ca2+ with association constants of 5 x 10(6) and 11 x 10(6) M-1, respectively. The ATPase activity of shM was activated about 3-fold by Ca2+. Both heads of myosin and shM had comparable ATPase activities in the presence of Ca2+. The activation of the ATPase activity of single-headed scallop myosin by Ca2+ paralleled closely the Ca2+ binding, in sharp contrast to the activation of intact myosin by Ca2+, which is highly cooperative. Single turnover experiments of myosin with radioactive ATP gave a half-life for the ATPase cycle of approximately 3 min in the presence of EGTA, whereas that of single-headed myosin was shorter than approximately 30 s, which was the resolution time of these measurements. The results suggest that the presence of two heads, as well as the attachment of the head to the coiled coil rod, contribute to the regulation of scallop myosin by Ca2+.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVie des artsSame topicVisual Culture and Art TheoryFrench-language works237,207