MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W89952209 · doi:10.15760/etd.7091

The Effect of a Physician's Pronunciation on Nurses' Perceptions of the Physician's Medical Competency

2000· report· en· W89952209 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Horani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Educational Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAirflowWater contentMoistureInletEnvironmental scienceHumidityKilnWork (physics)Indoor air qualityMeteorologyEnvironmental engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringWaste managementGeotechnical engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this work has been to minimize the thermal energy required to dry malt in deep beds while maintaining malt quality, and without increasing the drying time more than one hour. Malt drying usually takes place in deep bed (. 7-1 m) driers by forcing hot air through the bed. Measurements of inlet and outlet relative humidity, temperature, and airflow at a drier at Great Western Malting Company's Vancouver, Washington facility were made to find average moisture content versus time. The measurements were used to develop a wetted surface model of a malt bed. However, the model was not detailed enough to accurately fit the drying data taken from the kiln. Thus it was necessary to consider a more complex model. A diffusion based mathematical model of malt drying was coded using malt properties and drying equations found in the research of Bala (Ph.D. thesis, 1983). This program calculates moisture content and malt temperature in horizontal layers of a malt bed. Energy saving drying tests by airflow reduction methods were simulated with the program. The methods were designed to take advantage of the malt's internal drying mechanism, and they were effective at reducing energy consumption. However, model verification was necessary, and maintaining malt quality was essential. A deep bed experimental malt drier was built at Portland State University to allow malt temperature and average moisture content data collection. Drying experiments were performed at constant airflow, for several different drying temperature cases, and the highest experimental temperature with acceptable malt quality was found to be 7 5 C. Drying at 70 C (158 F) rather than at 63 C (145 F) was found to cause a 20% reduction in the thermal energy consumption, but higher temperatures did not significantly improve efficiency. The experimental moisture contents and grain temperatures generally compared well with diffusion model simulations of the experiments. Airflow reduction experiments decreased thermal consumption by 20% compared to typical drying schedules. These experiments were based on the airflow reduction methods learned from the diffusion model. However, diffusion model simulations using the experimental conditions showed thermal energy reductions of 11 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.073
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.073
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocial and Educational SciencesFrench-language works237,207