MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Development and Progression of Atherosclerosis: Evidence supporting a Role for Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress Signaling

2013· review· en· W90166600 on OpenAlexafffund
Cameron S. McAlpine, Geoff H. Werstuck

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiovascular & Haematological Disorders - Drug Targets · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEndoplasmic reticulumUnfolded protein responseDyslipidemiaCell biologyDiseaseOrganelleBiologyMedicineBioinformaticsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death worldwide. A major underlying cause of cardiovascular disease is atherosclerosis--a chronic inflammatory disease of the large arteries. Despite substantial advances over the past few decades, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that link cardiovascular risk factors to the development and progression of atherosclerosis is incomplete. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a membranous organelle found in all eukaryotic cells that is responsible for protein processing and lipid biosynthesis. In recent years it has become evident that disruptions in ER function are associated with a number of human diseases including atherosclerosis. In this review we examine the potential role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis and discuss possible strategies to target this pathway toward the development of new anti-atherogenic therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiovascular & Haematological Disorders - Drug TargetsSame topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207