MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W91214841

Crime, cultural reintegration and community healing: Narratives of an Inuit community (Nunavut).

2004· article· en· W91214841 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Kate J. Burkhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrongArctic Institute of North America
KeywordsNarrativeCriminologyPolitical scienceSociologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnitude and severity of violent and sexual assaults committed against Inuit women in the Nunavut Territory (NU) is tremendously alarming. This is of particular importance when considering the paucity of programming initiatives designed for Inuit offenders that target such offences. Current rehabilitation strategies for offenders in Nunavut emphasize the importance of victim-offender reconciliation and traditionally based healing programs. However, such approaches often ignore the needs of female victims, and may subject them to secondary harm. The birth of Nunavut has empowered Inuit to tailor correctional initiatives to meet their needs, and created the opportunity for tremendous reform within the existing justice structure. Research related exclusively to criminality amongst Inuit would greatly facilitate this process. The purpose of my project was to seek insight and understanding regarding Inuit experiences of violence against women, while highlighting aspects of such violence that were distinct to Inuit. I conducted semi-structured interviews in Iqaluit, NU with male inmates at the Baffin Correctional Centre (B.C.C.), female victims at Qimavik Women's Shelter, as well as employees injustice-related positions. I utilized qualitative methodology to analyze the interviews, with grounded theory techniques as my primary investigative framework. Ultimately, my objectives were to provide suggestions for intervention programming with Inuit offenders that would not re-victimize women. The treatment guidelines I developed focused upon personal and community healing of Inuit, largely through cultural redefinition and reintegration.Dept. of Psychology. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2004 .B87. Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-07, Section: B, page: 3770. Adviser: Michael Kral. Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0370.021
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207