MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W913652473 · doi:10.1093/fs/knp247

Nomadismes des romancières contemporaines de langue française Nomadismes des romancières contemporaines de langue française. Edited by A <scp>udrey</scp> L <scp>asserre</scp> and A <scp>nne</scp> S <scp>imon</scp> . Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle, 2008. 220 pp. Pb €19.90.

2009· article· fr· W913652473 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Günther

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNorth African History and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)NarrativeArtSubject (documents)MulticulturalismLiteratureHumanitiesArt historySociologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This collection of essays provides a wide-ranging study of geographical and identificatory transgressions in the work of contemporary French women writers. The book is divided into four sections, each of which investigates different areas of literary nomadisms which may be understood as strategies for undermining fixed notions of identity. In the first section, Dominique Combe's essay examines the work of Régine Robin, who introduced literary multiculturalism to Québec in the early 1990s. Christine Détrez's chapter highlights the constraints faced by Algerian women writers whose literary nomadism represents both self-expression and cultural transgression. The renewal of the detective genre in the work of Fred Vargas is the subject of the chapter by Sévérine Gaspari, who shows how Vargas transgresses gender boundaries by manipulating the genre's stereotyped conventions. Delphine Naudier explores the status of women writers from the nineteenth century to the present, demonstrating how women's writing has become increasingly androgynous. The second part of the book opens with Anne Simon's chapter on Annie Ernaux. Simon contends that Ernaux, like Proust, highlights the ephemeral nature of ‘self’ as a constantly changing process of momentary experiences and that the fluidity of her writing reflects this sense of identity as a ‘je traversé’ (p. 73). Diana Holmes argues that Nancy Huston's fiction questions the anti-narrative modes of writing inaugurated by the ‘nouveau roman’ and later reinforced by feminists who opposed the patriarchal underpinnings of classic realist fiction. Anne Mairesse analyses the displacement of gender identities through identification with the male hero-narrator in the work of Anne Garréta and Lydie Salvayre, while Eliane DalMolin's chapter examines how Ernaux, Salvayre and Nothomb exhibit the complexity of their experience through what she calls ‘une rhétorique du spectacle’ (p. 104). The third section of the book begins with Audrey Lasserre's study of Leslie Kaplan who identifies categories as a fundamental element of totalitarianism and whose ‘pensée nomade’ (p. 124) reflects her rejection of all categories. Armelle Le Bras-Chopard argues that Catherine Millet's sexualised discourse rehearses well-worn stereotypes of women. The work of Marie NDiaye is the subject of Shirley Jordan's chapter, which explores the significance of nomadism in NDiaye as an experience of exile, loss and exclusion. Simon Kemp looks at the impact of nomadic displacements on the identities of Marie Darrieussecq's characters, highlighting their ambivalent reactions of both attraction and revulsion vis-à-vis their homeland. Aline Bergé-Joonekindt examines the ‘history of the forgotten’ (p. 179) in the work of Zahia Rahmani, while André Benhaïm's analysis of displacement in Assia Djebar focuses on the image of ‘la marche’ as a metaphor of both textual and cultural movement. The closing chapter is Mireille Calle-Gruber's study of Andrée Chedid's Les Marches de sable in which nomadism becomes a search for both physical and spiritual nourishment. This volume shows a remarkable diversity of contributions while maintaining an excellent level of clarity and precision throughout. It makes an important contribution to the field of French women's writing and will be an invaluable resource for both students and researchers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicNorth African History and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207