The endothelial-protective effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition in the setting of ischemia and reperfusion injury
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Animal studies have consistently demonstrated the ability of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors to limit the damage induced by ischemia-reperfusion (IR) in the cardiac, cerebral and mesenteric circulation through a mechanism dependent on the upregulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Our group performed studies aimed at investigating the mechanism of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor-mediated endothelial protection from IR injury, in particular the role of COX-2, in a human in vivo model of IR-induced endothelial dysfunction. We demonstrated that HMG-CoA reductase inhibition protects against IR-induced endothelial damage, an effect that was lost upon COX-2 inhibition. These observations may suggest a mechanistic explanation for the cardioprotection observed in clinical settings such as percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass surgery and may also propose a mechanistic hypothesis for the reported cardiotoxic effects of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors observed in clinical studies. These studies are summarized and discussed in the present paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it