Effect of time-of-day on neuromuscular properties of knee extensors after a short exhaustive cycling exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the effect on neuromuscular properties of the knee extensors of an exhaustive cycling exercise performed at 6AM and 6PM. Eleven well trained cyclists performed a maximal aerobic exercise consisting in a sustained effort at 95% of their maximal power until exhaustion(T $_{lim}$ ). Isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and electromyographic activities (root mean square: RMS) of the vastus lateralis were recorded before (pre-test) and immediately after (post-test) the cycling exercise. The MVC/RMS ratio was calculated and used as an index of neuromuscular efficiency (NME). Rectal temperature was recorded continuously throughout the test session. Results show that T $_{lim}$ cycling exercise was not time-of-day dependent (p=0.42). A significant interaction effect of time of day and the cycling exercise was demonstrated for MVC (p<0.02) and NME(p<0.05). In pre-test, MVC and NME were higher in the late afternoon than in the morning (+6.8%); however both parameters were more affected by the T $_{lim}$ exercise at 6PM than at 6AM. These results suggest that following cycling T $_{lim}$ exercise, neuromuscular properties of the knee extensors are more affected in the evening than in the morning. However, circadian rhythm of some biomechanical parameters implicated in the pedalling movement may modulate the effect of these diurnal variations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".