MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Состав и подготовка учительских кадров для начального образования девочек в Вологодской губернии во второй половине ХIХ начале ХХ в

2014· article· en· W9194244 on OpenAlex
Л. Н. Колос

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueИсторическая и социально-образовательная мысль · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Education and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents the results of a qualitative study on women physicians in Quebec which aimed to go beyond a mere statistical description of the tendencies observed in their practices. It proposes an interpretation of their discourses on their practice and its context bringing to light the interdependence of individual strategies and structural constraints. We met 30 women physicians and eight men physicians asking them to talk freely about their personal and professional experience. The data reveal how the individual characteristics and interests of women physicians prevail in their decisions at key moments in their lives which have repercussions on the shaping of their practice. These moments include admission into the faculty of medicine, training, professional orientation and the choice of a specialized field, organization of professional practice and personal life. The medical practice of women is constructed through these choices and the gender variable plays a more or less significant role at each stage of this construction. Their distinctive choices reflect how gender relations are reproduced in the private sphere and the interactions between their private and professional lives. According to our participants, a difference lies in the place occupied by their profession in women and men physicians' lives. The private life of women physicians appears to be closely linked to their decisions regarding the organization of their professional life and as a result to the health services they provide, suggesting they have their own way of "being a physician". The individual nature of the strategies they adopt can have, at a collective level, consequences on the planning and the distribution of medical resources in the publicly managed health care system in Quebec while raising the global issue of gendered division of labor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it