Freedom on Enquiry and Expression of Christifideles? Some Juridical Considerations Starting from Canon 218
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'A. explore le cadre, l'histoire, les caracteristiques, les implications et autres perspectives de la liberte de recherche et d'expression, telle que presentee dans les deux Codes. La premiere partie presente un cadre historique et doctrinal, ainsi que le developpement historique de la liberte d'enquete et d'expression tel que propose par le canon 218 du Code de Droit canonique et le canon 21 du Code des canons des Eglises orientales. La deuxieme partie analyse les caracteristiques des sujets de la liberte, les experts en disciplines sacrees, l'objet de la liberte, la juste liberte d'enquete et d'expression et la limite principale de la liberte, l'obsequium au magistere. La troisieme partie met l'accent sur le rapport entre le magistere et le theologien, qui est manifeste concretement dans les diverses procedures juridiques: mandat d'enseigner, profession de foi et serment de fidelite, les criteres pour utiliser les moyens de communication sociale et l'examen doctrinal par la Congregation pour la Doctrine de la Foi. La derniere partie presente les « nouveaux horizons » que la liberte d'enquete et d'expression ouvre. L'A. conclut que la liberte de recherche et d'expression doit etre appliquee a tous les fideles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".