MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W92212805 · doi:10.1086/321162

High-Resolution Images of CO [ITAL]J[/ITAL] = 2–1 Emission from the Carbon Star V Cygni

2001· article· en· W92212805 on OpenAlexaff
John H. Bieging, C. D. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsRADIUSCircumstellar envelopeCarbon starLuminosityEffective temperatureEnvelope (radar)MillimeterFlux (metallurgy)Emission spectrumBrightnessKinetic energySpectral lineAstronomyStarsGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents observations of the CO J = 2–1 emission from the circumstellar envelope of the mass-losing carbon star V Cyg. The observations were made with the Caltech Millimeter Array. A previously published single-dish map was used to construct short-spacing visibilities not sampled by the interferometer data, thereby recovering missing flux in extended low brightness emission. The images have an angular resolution of ∼1 2 with a velocity resolution of 1 MHz (1.3 km s -1 ). The channel maps are consistent with an expanding envelope that is roughly spherical, but they also show evidence for asymmetric structure, as well as small-scale clumping. We compare these observations, as well as other published spectra, with statistical equilibrium models for CO in a circumstellar envelope. Models that fit the spherically averaged data must invoke a mass-loss rate, , that has decreased with time by a factor of ∼2–3 over the past several hundred years. The model kinetic temperature structure in radius, T K ( r ), decreases as r -0.8 out to r ≈ 6 × 10 15 cm and levels off to a constant value at T K = 23 K beyond. The secular change in may be related to changes in the stellar luminosity or temperature, as predicted by recent numerical hydrodynamic models for mass loss. The inferred kinetic temperature structure suggests that heating by the photoelectric effect on dust grains is important in the outer envelope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207